Did you break into
some houses and steal
stuff, like this camera?
I would never
do that!
30-45 minutes of
questioning goes
by...
Will I still be in
trouble if I return
everything?
You may have to
go to juvenile
hall.
I confess. I will
write a
statement.
1. Was JDB free to leave this situation when the police officer brought him to the office and began
questioning him?
2. Do you think that this 13-year-old child, JDB, should have been told directly that he was not in custody
and was free to leave?
3. Why would it be helpful to the police to not have to worry about the Fifth Amendment protections?
Why is it a good thing that the Fifth Amendment can be used to help someone not incriminate themselves?

The police practice of not informing individuals of their rights violates the Fifth Amendment. The Supreme Court ruling in J.D.B. v. North Carolina emphasizes the importance of age considerations during police questioning. Failure to provide Miranda warnings can lead to inadmissible confessions in court due to constitutional violations.

Explanation:

Yes, the police practice of interrogating individuals without informing them of their right to counsel and protection against self-incrimination violates the Fifth Amendment. The Fifth Amendment protects individuals from being compelled to incriminate themselves.

In the case of J.D.B. v. North Carolina (2011), the Supreme Court ruled that age should be considered in determining if a student is in police custody. Police should provide Miranda warnings to individuals to ensure their rights are protected during questioning.

Not informing individuals of their rights can lead to inadmissible confessions in court due to violations of constitutional protections like the Fifth Amendment.

Learn more about Fifth Amendment rights during police interrogations here:

https://brainly.com/question/41340201