Based on current evidence, many scientists support the hypothesis that life originated in the following order.
• Development of RNA
• Use of RNA to form proteins
• Incorporation of RNA and proteins into single-celled organisms
Recently, scientists have collected new evidence that supports an alternative claim. In this new hypothesis, RNA and
proteins originated at the same time and interacted with each other as
they formed. How should other scientists evaluate
these hypotheses
?
by accepting both hypotheses without any revisions
by Ignoring evidence from both hypotheses and considering a third hypothesis
by analyzing the evidence that supports the second hypothesis to determine its plausibility
by dismissing evidence from the older hypothesis because new evidence has been presented

Question

20-05-2024
Biology

Answered

Based on current evidence, many scientists support the hypothesis that life originated in the following order.
• Development of RNA
• Use of RNA to form proteins
• Incorporation of RNA and proteins into single-celled organisms
Recently, scientists have collected new evidence that supports an alternative claim. In this new hypothesis, RNA and
proteins originated at the same time and interacted with each other as
they formed. How should other scientists evaluate
these hypotheses
?
by accepting both hypotheses without any revisions
by Ignoring evidence from both hypotheses and considering a third hypothesis
by analyzing the evidence that supports the second hypothesis to determine its plausibility
by dismissing evidence from the older hypothesis because new evidence has been presented

Answer :

Other Questions

How has your study of Lesson 6 deepened and made the phrase more meaningful?

Last weekend, Kimi participated in a 5,000-meter fun run for charity. She ran at a steady pace of 125 meters per minute. How long did it take Kimi to complete t

Step 1: Identify the speech you selected for this assessment. Remember, you could choose from the followingspeeches that may be found online:Queen Elizabeth I's

Read two sources about civilian activities that aided the war effort during World War II. As you read, look for key points, or main ideas.

Building a house uses natural resources, human resources, and capital goods. In 1-3 sentences, give an example ofeach productive resource that can be used to ma

Does anyone have any info for the music piece Wondrous machines by purcell. Like texture or who it is meant to be sung by?

answers 0.064 0.074 1.0 0.066

Which is true of the material thatmakes up high resistance wires?A. The wire is made out of a material that is not agood conductor.B. The wire is made out of a

In the circular flow model of income and output, households sell which services to businesses that pay for those Businesses sell goods and services

Billy and Sally are brother and sister. Sally is five years older than Billy. The sum of their ages is 53 years. How old are Billy and Sally?

GinnyAnswer GinnyAnswer · Answer 1 · 2024-05-20T08:33:23-04:00

When evaluating the two hypotheses regarding the origin of life, scientists should consider the following approach:

1. Analyze the Evidence: Scientists should carefully examine the evidence presented in support of both hypotheses. They need to assess the quality, reliability, and relevance of the data and experiments that underpin each hypothesis. This critical analysis will help in determining the strength of each argument.

2. Compare the Mechanisms: Scientists should compare the proposed mechanisms of how life originated in each hypothesis. Understanding how RNA and proteins interacted and led to the formation of early life forms is crucial. By examining the plausibility and coherence of these mechanisms, scientists can assess the validity of each hypothesis.

3. Evaluate Consistency with Existing Knowledge: Scientists should assess how well each hypothesis aligns with existing scientific knowledge and principles. They need to consider whether the hypotheses are consistent with known biochemical processes, evolutionary theory, and other relevant scientific frameworks. Consistency with established scientific principles enhances the credibility of a hypothesis.

4. Seek Additional Evidence: If necessary, scientists should conduct further experiments or research to gather more evidence that can either support or refute the hypotheses. Additional data can help strengthen the case for one hypothesis over the other by providing new insights or confirming existing findings.

5. Openness to Revision: Scientists should remain open to revising their views based on new evidence and insights. Scientific inquiry is a dynamic process, and hypotheses should be subject to revision or rejection based on the accumulation of new data and the evolution of scientific understanding.

By following these steps and engaging in a rigorous evaluation process, scientists can effectively assess the validity, reliability, and implications of the competing hypotheses regarding the origin of life. This approach ensures that scientific conclusions are based on sound reasoning and empirical evidence.