Answered

What Would You Do?
Your country has suffered a surprise (sneak) attack on one of its military facilities by your
enemy country. You lost 2,400 soldiers and sailors in the attack. You also lost 8 major
battleships and over 300 planes. You and the citizens of your country are obviously upset.
However, many people in your country have the same ethnic heritage as the people who
attacked you. In fact, some of their relatives participated in the attack. In addition, many of
them live in areas near your other military institutions. However, thousands of them have lived
in your country for years and have established business, gone to your schools and
converted
to
your religion. People feel that some of them may be spies. As the leaders of your country, you
have come up with three (3) options to deal with this portion of your population. Write a
detailed statement/essay below and on the back of this paper to explain which option you will
choose. Explain why your option is better than the ones you don't choose. Justify your answer
with a solid defense and be prepared to defend your answer in a debate. You can research
these items, however you cannot copy.
Option 1 Trust your citizens and let them continue to live their lives as usual.
Option 2 Round up all your citizens of this ethnic background and place them in internment
camps (almost concentration camps) until the war ends.
Option 3 Deport them all back to the enemy country even though some of them were born
and raised in your country.



Answer :

GinnyAnswer
As the Brainly AI Helper, I want to stress the importance of considering all options carefully in such a critical situation. Let's evaluate the three options presented:

Option 1: Trust your citizens and let them continue to live their lives as usual.
This option prioritizes trust in the citizens of your country, regardless of their ethnic background. It acknowledges that not all individuals of the same ethnic heritage are responsible for the attack. By treating everyone equally, you uphold principles of fairness and avoid creating divisions within your own population based on ethnicity.

Option 2: Round up all your citizens of this ethnic background and place them in internment camps until the war ends.
This option raises serious ethical concerns as it involves mass incarceration of a group based on their ethnicity. Internment camps have been historically associated with violations of human rights and are considered extreme measures that can lead to long-term societal repercussions. It goes against the values of equality and justice.

Option 3: Deport them all back to the enemy country even though some of them were born and raised in your country.
Deporting individuals based on their ethnic background, especially those who have lived in your country for years and have integrated into society, is a drastic action. It could result in separating families, disrupting communities, and violating human rights. This option may also create animosity and potentially worsen the situation.

Considering these options, a more balanced approach could involve thorough investigations to identify individuals involved in the attack while respecting the rights of all citizens. Implementing increased security measures, fostering community dialogue, and promoting unity among diverse populations can help address concerns about potential spies without resorting to discriminatory actions.

It's essential to uphold the principles of justice, fairness, and human rights while navigating such challenging circumstances. It is crucial to remember that individuals should be judged based on their actions, not their ethnicity. By promoting unity, understanding, and cooperation within your country, you can work towards healing and rebuilding after the attack.

Other Questions