How did the New Deal change the level of involvement in the American people's lives?
A High rates if unemployment led to the American people wanting less government involvement in the
economy.
B Poor economic conditions led to higher levels of federal government involvement in the lives of the
American people.
C Efforts by individual states to expand their constitutional rights led to the restriction of government
involvement in people's lives.
D Threats to national security led to the federal government to restrict freedom of speech.



Answer :

The New Deal, a series of programs and policies implemented by President Franklin D. Roosevelt during the Great Depression in the 1930s, significantly changed the level of government involvement in the lives of the American people. Here are the correct options:

B Poor economic conditions led to higher levels of federal government involvement in the lives of the American people.

During the Great Depression, which was characterized by widespread unemployment, poverty, and economic instability, the federal government, under the New Deal, intervened in unprecedented ways to address the crisis. Programs like the Social Security Act, the Works Progress Administration (WPA), and the Civilian Conservation Corps (CCC) were established to provide relief, create jobs, and stimulate economic recovery. These initiatives increased the federal government's involvement in the lives of individuals by offering assistance and support during a time of national hardship.

D Threats to national security led to the federal government to restrict freedom of speech.

During times of war or national security threats, the government may impose restrictions on certain rights, including freedom of speech, to safeguard the country. This is done to prevent the dissemination of sensitive information that could endanger national security. While the New Deal focused more on economic recovery and social welfare programs rather than restrictions on civil liberties like freedom of speech, it's important to recognize that national security concerns can lead to government actions that limit certain freedoms.