Read the passage from the opinion of the court in Dred
Scott v. Sandford, written by Justice Taney.
The question before us is, whether the class of persons
described in the plea in abatement compose a portion
of this people, and are constituent members of this
sovereignty? We think they are not, and that they are
not included, and were not intended to be included,
under the word "citizens" in the Constitution, and can
therefore claim none of the rights and privileges which
that instrument provides for and secures to citizens of
the United States. On the contrary, they were at that
time considered as a subordinate and inferior class of
beings, who had been subjugated by the dominant
race, and, whether emancipated or not, yet remained
subject to their authority, and had no rights or privileges
but such as those who held the power and the
Government might choose to grant them.
Which statement best serves as a counterclaim to the
claim in this passage?
O Taney fails to provide any actual evidence for his
statements that Black people were universally
considered inferior.
O Taney cannot use states' rights to claim that the
plaintiff is not a citizen, because citizenship is
federal.
O Taney's argument that emancipated people were still
controlled by White people is false because they
were free.
O Taney's argument that Blacks were not citizens is
false because their ancestors were forced to come
here.

Question

Cloudylamb Cloudylamb

20-05-2024
English

Answered

Read the passage from the opinion of the court in Dred
Scott v. Sandford, written by Justice Taney.
The question before us is, whether the class of persons
described in the plea in abatement compose a portion
of this people, and are constituent members of this
sovereignty? We think they are not, and that they are
not included, and were not intended to be included,
under the word "citizens" in the Constitution, and can
therefore claim none of the rights and privileges which
that instrument provides for and secures to citizens of
the United States. On the contrary, they were at that
time considered as a subordinate and inferior class of
beings, who had been subjugated by the dominant
race, and, whether emancipated or not, yet remained
subject to their authority, and had no rights or privileges
but such as those who held the power and the
Government might choose to grant them.
Which statement best serves as a counterclaim to the
claim in this passage?
O Taney fails to provide any actual evidence for his
statements that Black people were universally
considered inferior.
O Taney cannot use states' rights to claim that the
plaintiff is not a citizen, because citizenship is
federal.
O Taney's argument that emancipated people were still
controlled by White people is false because they
were free.
O Taney's argument that Blacks were not citizens is
false because their ancestors were forced to come
here.

Answer :

Other Questions

what is 6=hj+k for j

Did Abraham Lincoln use a cane

Find the volume of a square pyramid 13 m tall whose base measures 5 m on a side

Write a paragraph explaining the effect of surface area on the rate of reaction. Also do he same for a catalyst. Mention the collision theory and draw diagrams

If heroes are a reflection of "who we are as a culture and as people," what does King Arthur reflect? What traits does he show that Western society values?

Construct a food chain for each list of organisms below.. moose, fish, osprey, black fly, grass.. grass, wolf, mosquito, deer, dragonfly

Consider the experiment of tossing a coin twice, Let A and B be two events defined below. A=(first toss results in H) and B= (second toss results in H) the even

am nevoie de o scrisoare informala

Which of the following is a fourth degree trinomial with a leading coefficient of 2?A x  x2 2x4B 2x4 8x3 x  2

GinnyAnswer GinnyAnswer · Answer 1 · 2024-05-20T17:05:37-04:00

In this passage from the opinion of the court in Dred Scott v. Sandford, Justice Taney argues that Black people are not considered citizens and therefore do not have the rights and privileges granted by the Constitution to citizens of the United States. To provide a counterclaim to this argument, one could argue the following:

1. Taney fails to provide any actual evidence for his statements that Black people were universally considered inferior. One could challenge Taney's assertion by asking for concrete proof or historical evidence supporting the claim that Black people were universally viewed as subordinate and inferior at that time.

2. Taney's argument that Blacks were not citizens is false because their ancestors were forced to come here. By pointing out that many Black individuals in the United States are descendants of enslaved Africans who were brought to the country against their will, one could argue that this history undermines Taney's argument that Black people are not included as citizens.

These counterclaims provide alternative perspectives and challenge the reasoning presented in Taney's opinion, prompting a critical examination of the assumptions and assertions made in the passage from the court opinion.