The notion that the transition from hunting/gathering to settled agriculture and
later industrial society was a positive step in the evolution of human societies is
ethnocentric because the adoption of agriculture:
Actually had many adverse (negative) consequences
O Resulted in an increase in infectious crowd diseases relative to hunter/gatherers
Led to massive social stratification and inequality
○ None of these statements are accurate. The notion that the shift to agriculture represents
"progress" is not an ethnocentric idea.
O All of these are reasons why the idea agriculture was a positive step is ethnocentric. For
many people, things got much worse.

The adoption of agriculture had both positive and negative implications for human societies, affecting social structures and leading to diverse outcomes.

Explanation:

Agriculture played a significant role in shaping human societies, leading to changes in social organization, wealth accumulation, and technological advancements.

Marshall Sahlins and other scholars have argued that the adoption of agriculture brought about negative consequences such as social inequality and environmental degradation.

Archaeological evidence shows that the transition to agriculture was not universally beneficial, as it led to societal complexities and challenges like resource depletion and social stratification.

Learn more about Agriculture's impact on human societies here:

https://brainly.com/question/5057424