Which of the following is NOT a result of affluence that is harmful to the environment?
Olower birth rates
O increased access to products from other parts of the world
Ohigher levels of per capita resource consumption
O expanded per capita ecological footprints
lower quality of life



Answer :

Final answer:

Lower birth rates are not harmful to the environment as opposed to other effects of affluence such as increased consumption and ecological footprints.


Explanation:

Lower birth rates are NOT a result of affluence that is harmful to the environment. Instead, increased access to products from other parts of the world, higher levels of per capita resource consumption, and expanded per capita ecological footprints contribute to environmental harm due to affluence.


Learn more about Impact of affluence on the environment here:

https://brainly.com/question/29736156