"What evidence supports the idea that the Bill of Rights was key to the ratification of the Constitution?
OA. Without it, there would have been no explicit mention of the principle of popular sovereignty.
OB. Without it, the Founders' intentions about selecting the president would have been ambiguous.
OC. Without it, there would not have been equal representation of large and small states in Congress.
○ D. Without it, the Founders would have lost the support of Anti-Federalists toward ratification.



Answer :

Final answer:

The Bill of Rights was essential for ratifying the Constitution by addressing concerns about protecting individual rights.


Explanation:

The Bill of Rights played a crucial role in the ratification of the Constitution. Without it, the Anti-Federalists, who emphasized the need for specific rights to be protected, could have derailed the ratification process.

George Mason, an Anti-Federalist, is often credited as the 'father of the Bill of Rights'. His advocacy for a list of rights to be added to the Constitution was a significant factor in securing approval from key states like New York and Virginia.

The absence of a Bill of Rights was a major concern for many Pro-Constitution individuals as well, who believed it was essential to ensure individual freedoms and protect against government overreach.


Learn more about Ratification of the Constitution here:

https://brainly.com/question/41828783