Answered

Suppose that the premises of an argument are: "All dogs are green"
and "No green things are tall." Which of these conclusions makes
the argument valid?
O "All dogs are tall."
O "No dogs are tall."
O "Dogs are mammals."
O "All tall things are dogs."
O None of these



Answer :

GinnyAnswer

Final answer:

The conclusion "No dogs are tall." is valid based on the provided premises.


Explanation:

Valid conclusion: "No dogs are tall." makes the argument valid as it follows logically from the premises given. When all dogs are green and no green things are tall, it logically follows that no dogs are tall.

Examples: If we consider a scenario where all green things are plants and all dogs are green, it would make sense that no dogs are tall as trees, for instance, are green but not tall.

Explanation: Validity in arguments is not dependent on the truth of premises but on the logical connection between premises and conclusion. In this case, the conclusion drawn logically follows from the given premises, making it valid.


Learn more about Logical reasoning here:

https://brainly.com/question/34212737


Other Questions