An inductive argument (as opposed to a deductive one)
◇ strives to give probabilistic evidence for the truth of its conclusion.
O goes from the specific to the general.
O attempts to be valid.
O is always cogent.
O is always sound.

Inductive arguments rely on probabilistic evidence, moving from specific to general conclusions, and can be strong or weak based on the probability of the conclusion.

Explanation:

Inductive arguments are based on probabilistic evidence and move from specific instances to a general conclusion. They aim to provide support to the conclusion but do not guarantee it, making them defeasible and reliant on the strength of the inference. Unlike deductive reasoning, inductive arguments can be strong or weak based on the level of probability of the conclusion.

Learn more about Inductive reasoning here:

https://brainly.com/question/39567728

An inductive argument (as opposed to a deductive one)◇ strives to give probabilistic evidence for the truth of its conclusion.O goes from the specific to the general.O attempts to be valid.O is always cogent.O is always sound.

Answer :

Final answer:

Explanation:

Learn more about Inductive reasoning here:

Other Questions

An inductive argument (as opposed to a deductive one)
◇ strives to give probabilistic evidence for the truth of its conclusion.
O goes from the specific to the general.
O attempts to be valid.
O is always cogent.
O is always sound.