Final answer:
The argument is deductive, demonstrating the logical conclusion from true premises about Charles and backgammon.
Explanation:
The argument provided is deductive as it aims to demonstrate that the conclusion must be true if the premises are true. In this case, the conclusion that Charles does not like backgammon logically follows from the premise that no soccer players like backgammon.
For example, if we state that 'All mammals lay eggs' and 'A platypus is a mammal,' we can deduce that 'A platypus lays eggs.' This showcases the deductive reasoning used in the argument about Charles and backgammon.
Learn more about Deductive reasoning here:
https://brainly.com/question/33916630
