In Tinker v. Des Moines, precedent was used to support the argument that wearing armbands was a form of protected speech under the First Amendment.
Precedent in Tinker v. Des Moines:
In Tinker v. Des Moines (1969), the excerpt that shows how precedent supports an argument is option C, where it references prior Supreme Court cases like Cox v. Louisiana and Adderley v. Florida to establish that wearing armbands constituted 'pure speech' protected under the First Amendment. By citing previous rulings, the court in Tinker v. Des Moines reinforced the protection of symbolic speech like wearing armbands as a form of political expression.
https://brainly.com/question/1361311