The plaintiff could not recover based on the presence of a bone in the fish.
The result of the case where a plaintiff sued a restaurant after getting a bone caught in her throat while eating a fish entree was that the plaintiff could not recover because the bone was not a foreign substance to the fish. The presence of a bone in the fish is considered an inherent risk when consuming fish, thus the plaintiff would not be able to recover based on this incident.
https://brainly.com/question/32782699