?
Which opinion is least likely to have been held by a colonist at the close of the 1760s?
OI do not see why I should pay a tax to the British government that I didn't have to pay previously.
O If everyone in Parliament speaks for us, then how is it that some of these acts infringe on our civil liberties?
A similar stamp duty has been used successfully in Britain, so maybe it could work here.
O Who decided to send these troops anyway? We were doing fine without them.

NoTaxation Without Representation: A colonist holding the opinion 'If everyone in Parliament speaks for us, then how is it that some of these acts infringe on our civil liberties?' would be least likely at the close of the 1760s. This statement questions how Parliament represents their interests while enacting laws that impact them negatively, indicating an understanding of representation concerns.

Taxation Issues: The other three opinions reflect common sentiments among colonists in the late 1760s regarding taxation without representation, objections to new taxes, and resistance towards British control, which were prevalent during that period.

Colonial Opposition: The rejection of British interference and lack of representation led to organized dissent and protests, such as the Stamp Act resistance and the call for colonial self-governance to address the ongoing issues with taxation and representation.

Learn more about Colonial Opposition to British Taxation and Representation here:

https://brainly.com/question/42981637