What is not true about the earliest fossil evidence found for a multi-cellular animal?
It was found in South Japan
It is dated from about 605-600 million years ago
The fossils had parts of sponges and cnidarians
It is from the Edicaran Period

Question

05-06-2024
History

Answered

What is not true about the earliest fossil evidence found for a multi-cellular animal?
It was found in South Japan
It is dated from about 605-600 million years ago
The fossils had parts of sponges and cnidarians
It is from the Edicaran Period

Answer :

Other Questions

The statement: "Americans will be the healthiest people in the world—living in communities that promote health, protected from health threats, and having access

Collect fluorescent lamps for off-site recycling with mercury recovery.Use a metals recovery unit in a process to capture metals before discharge of wastewater

What plate boundary would cause theformation of folded mountains?

3. Observe the number line carefully and write the coordinate of K?K+11(1) - 1.04(2) - 1.4(3)-322/3(4)23- 1

Which scale of sexual orientation has the concept of sexual fluidity built into it (i.e., is an explicit feature of the scale)?A) StormsB) KleinC) RobertsD) Kin

Configure a Firewall. Defien some rules. Writeyour observation

In order to thrive animals must complete certain life processes. _______, is a life process that requires energy. a. Hopping b. Photosynthesis c. Body repair d.

flip a pair of coins thirty times and record the nu,ber of times a heads comes up, the number a pair of tails comes up and the number of times one head and one

How did traditional authority and the emphasis on individual interpretation of scripture might have influenced enlightenment philosophies?

GinnyAnswer GinnyAnswer · Answer 1 · 2024-06-05T15:33:29-04:00

Final answer:

The earliest fossil evidence for a multi-cellular animal was not found in South Japan but in South Australia, dating back about 650 million years ago.

Explanation:

The statement that the earliest fossil evidence for a multi-cellular animal was found in South Japan is not true. The correct location is South Australia. The fossils, including sponge-like creatures with hard body parts, date back to about 650 million years ago, predating the Ediacaran period.

Learn more about Earliest fossil evidence for multi-cellular animal here:

https://brainly.com/question/751397

What is not true about the earliest fossil evidence found for a multi-cellular animal?It was found in South JapanIt is dated from about 605-600 million years agoThe fossils had parts of sponges and cnidariansIt is from the Edicaran Period

Answer :

Final answer:

Explanation:

Learn more about Earliest fossil evidence for multi-cellular animal here:

Other Questions

What is not true about the earliest fossil evidence found for a multi-cellular animal?
It was found in South Japan
It is dated from about 605-600 million years ago
The fossils had parts of sponges and cnidarians
It is from the Edicaran Period