Everyone goes to college to make a higher income. Graduates of Alexander College
see their earning potential go up by [tex]$14,000 per year, whereas graduates of Bell
College only see their earning potential go up by $[/tex]11,000 per year. Anyone
considering college should choose Alexander over Bell. Which one of the following is
an error in reasoning committed by the argument?
It is circular (i.e., it assumes the very thing it is trying to prove).
It fails to take into account people who are not considering going to college.
It relies on a false premise.
It relies on a non-sequitur.
It relies on the absence of evidence as evidence of the opposite.

Fail to take into account people who are not considering going to college: The error in reasoning committed by the argument is that it does not consider individuals who are not contemplating going to college. It assumes that everyone is considering college as an option, which may not be the case.

Relies on a false premise: Another error is the assumption that the sole purpose of attending college is to increase income. While higher income may be a significant factor, there are various other reasons why individuals pursue higher education.

Relies on the absence of evidence as evidence of the opposite: Lastly, the argument relies on the absence of evidence to support the superiority of Alexander College over Bell College. It lacks comprehensive data to conclusively state that one college is superior solely based on income potential.

Learn more about Logical Fallacies here:

https://brainly.com/question/29368484