Which excerpt from Tinker v. Des Moines shows how preceden
helps support an argument?
OA. "One does not need to be a prophet or the son of a
prophet to know that, after the Court's holding today
some students in lowa schools and, indeed, in all.
schools will be ready, able, and willing to defy thei
teachers on practically all orders.
B. "While the absence of obscene remarks or boisterous
and loud disorder perhaps justifies the Court's
statement that the few armband students did not
actually "disrupt" the classwork, I think the record
overwhelmingly shows that the armbands did exactly
what the elected school officials and principals
forecaw they would"



Answer :

Final answer:

The excerpt in option B from Tinker v. Des Moines demonstrates how precedent supports the argument for protected student expression based on the Court's ruling regarding disruptive conduct.


Explanation:

Precedent is crucial in legal arguments, as seen in Tinker v. Des Moines where the Court upheld students' rights to express themselves freely unless their actions materially and substantially interfere with school operations. In the excerpt provided, option B showcases how precedent from the Court's ruling in Tinker v. Des Moines is used to explain why the armbands worn by students did not disrupt classwork, supporting an argument for protected expression.


Learn more about Tinker v. Des Moines here:

https://brainly.com/question/31697379