The excerpt in option B from Tinker v. Des Moines demonstrates how precedent supports the argument for protected student expression based on the Court's ruling regarding disruptive conduct.
Precedent is crucial in legal arguments, as seen in Tinker v. Des Moines where the Court upheld students' rights to express themselves freely unless their actions materially and substantially interfere with school operations. In the excerpt provided, option B showcases how precedent from the Court's ruling in Tinker v. Des Moines is used to explain why the armbands worn by students did not disrupt classwork, supporting an argument for protected expression.
https://brainly.com/question/31697379