Answer :
Final answer:
In the Dred Scott v. Sandford case, Taney argued against Black citizenship, but criticisms include lack of concrete evidence and the questioning of control over emancipated individuals.
Explanation:
In the Dred Scott v. Sandford case, Chief Justice Taney argued that Black individuals could not be citizens of the United States, denying them constitutional rights and privileges. One counterclaim to this argument could be that Taney's statement about Black people being universally inferior lacks concrete evidence and is subjective.
Emancipated individuals being controlled by white people after gaining freedom, as suggested by Taney, is also questioned as they were legally free. Taney's assertion that Black individuals were not citizens due to their ancestral history of being forced to come to the U.S. is refuted by citizenship laws being based on birthright and legal status.