The debate over the necessity of a Bill of Rights involved concerns about implied rights, abuse of power, and the adequacy of the Constitution's enumerated powers.
Alexander Hamilton argued that listing specific rights might be dangerous as it could imply that the rights not included were not protected, providing a pretext for abuse. The Federalists believed that the enumerated powers of Congress and limitations in the Constitution were sufficient, making a separate Bill of Rights unnecessary. On the other hand, opponents feared the new government's power and the lack of explicit rights protections, such as a Bill of Rights.
https://brainly.com/question/46218321