The response explains the concept of assumptions in arguments, particularly regarding the Legalization of Marijuana, explores assumptions in pro and con stances, and discusses how opposition can challenge these assumptions.
Assumption refers to unstated premises that underlie an argument, taken for granted by the arguer or audience. In the context of the Legalization of Marijuana, a pro stance could assume benefits like economic growth and medicinal value, while a con stance may assume potential negative impacts on public health and safety.
For a pro argument on Legalization of Marijuana, assumptions about job creation, tax revenue, and medical benefits may be made. The opposition could attack these assumptions by questioning the reliability of data supporting these claims, highlighting potential social harms, or pointing out lack of comprehensive regulatory frameworks.
In conclusion, understanding and addressing underlying assumptions is crucial in constructing and defending arguments on controversial issues like Legalization of Marijuana.
https://brainly.com/question/39013807