Read the following passage to answer the question below.

"There is no position which depends on clearer principles, than that every act of a delegated authority, contrary to the tenor of the commission under which it is exercised, is void. No legislative act, therefore, contrary to the Constitution, can be valid."
—Alexander Hamilton, Federalist No. 78, "The Judiciary Department," 1788

Which of the following statements best summarizes Hamilton's argument?

A. The Supreme Court should have the power of judicial review.
B. Arguments against the adoption of the Constitution are invalid.
C. The Constitution delegates ultimate authority to the legislative branch.
D. Few legislative acts are contrary to the Constitution.



Answer :

Final answer:

Hamilton's argument in Federalist No. 78 highlights the significance of judicial review to ensure the validity of legislative acts.


Explanation:

Alexander Hamilton, in Federalist No. 78, argues that the power of judicial review is essential. He asserts that any legislative act that goes against the Constitution is invalid, emphasizing the importance of upholding the Constitution over any conflicting laws.


Learn more about judicial review here:

https://brainly.com/question/42269029