The table shows the total number of ships and planes two countries could each produce if they fully devoted their economic resources to producing one or the other. The data in the table most support which conclusion?

\begin{tabular}{|c|c|c|}
\hline
& \textbf{Number of ships produced per day} & \textbf{Number of planes produced per day} \\
\hline
\textbf{Country A} & 100 & 50 \\
\hline
\textbf{Country B} & 60 & 20 \\
\hline
\end{tabular}

A. Country A has a comparative advantage producing ships.
B. Country A has a comparative advantage producing planes.
C. Country B has an absolute advantage producing planes.
D. Country B has an absolute advantage producing ships.



Answer :

To determine which of the given conclusions is most supported by the data in the table, we need to analyze the concepts of opportunity cost, comparative advantage, and absolute advantage.

### Absolute Advantage:
Absolute advantage refers to the ability of a country to produce more of a good or service with the same amount of resources than another country.

- Ships:
- Country A produces 100 ships per day.
- Country B produces 60 ships per day.
- Conclusion: Country A has the absolute advantage in producing ships because 100 is greater than 60.

- Planes:
- Country A produces 50 planes per day.
- Country B produces 20 planes per day.
- Conclusion: Country A has the absolute advantage in producing planes because 50 is greater than 20.

### Opportunity Cost and Comparative Advantage:
Comparative advantage refers to the ability of a country to produce a good at a lower opportunity cost than another country.

#### For Country A:
- Opportunity cost of producing one ship:
[tex]\[ \text{Opportunity cost of one ship} = \frac{\text{Planes}}{\text{Ships}} = \frac{50}{100} = 0.5 \text{ planes} \][/tex]
- Opportunity cost of producing one plane:
[tex]\[ \text{Opportunity cost of one plane} = \frac{\text{Ships}}{\text{Planes}} = \frac{100}{50} = 2 \text{ ships} \][/tex]

#### For Country B:
- Opportunity cost of producing one ship:
[tex]\[ \text{Opportunity cost of one ship} = \frac{\text{Planes}}{\text{Ships}} = \frac{20}{60} \approx 0.333 \text{ planes} \][/tex]
- Opportunity cost of producing one plane:
[tex]\[ \text{Opportunity cost of one plane} = \frac{\text{Ships}}{\text{Planes}} = \frac{60}{20} = 3 \text{ ships} \][/tex]

#### Comparing Opportunity Costs:
- Ships:
- Country A: 0.5 planes per ship.
- Country B: 0.333 planes per ship.
- Conclusion: Country B has the comparative advantage in producing ships since 0.333 (Country B’s opportunity cost) is less than 0.5 (Country A’s opportunity cost).

- Planes:
- Country A: 2 ships per plane.
- Country B: 3 ships per plane.
- Conclusion: Country A has the comparative advantage in producing planes since 2 (Country A’s opportunity cost) is less than 3 (Country B’s opportunity cost).

### Conclusion:
Given the concepts of absolute and comparative advantage derived from the data in the table:

- A. Country A has a comparative advantage producing ships. Incorrect. Country B has the comparative advantage in producing ships.
- B. Country A has a comparative advantage producing planes. Correct. Country A has the comparative advantage in producing planes.
- C. Country B has an absolute advantage producing planes. Incorrect. Country A has the absolute advantage in producing planes.
- D. Country B has an absolute advantage producing ships. Incorrect. Country A has the absolute advantage in producing ships.

Therefore, the data in the table most support the conclusion:
B. Country A has a comparative advantage producing planes.