Trying to decide who is best hockey player currently playing is not easy. The measure of a star cannot be assessed only by looking at his scoring performance. Other contributions, both on and off the ice, have to be factored in. Some contributions, such as assists, are easy to measure and others, like leadership ability, are difficult. What type of plagiarism is this?

The passage you provided does not appear to be plagiarism; it seems to be a discussion or commentary on how to evaluate the best hockey player based on various criteria beyond just scoring performance. Plagiarism typically involves using someone else's words, ideas, or expressions without proper attribution.

However, if this passage closely resembles or directly quotes another source without proper citation, it could potentially be considered as plagiarism of ideas or content. To determine if it is plagiarism, one would need to compare it directly with the original source to see if there are significant similarities.

If this text is based on your own analysis or thoughts, then it's not plagiarism. It's important to always properly attribute sources when borrowing specific ideas, phrases, or structure from other sources to avoid unintentional plagiarism.