Answered

The Hetch-Hetchy debate was one of the first between anthropocentrists and ecocentrists. A more recent example is the debate about whether to allow drilling for oil in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in Northern Alaska. The refuge protects a greater amount of biodiversity than any other area within the Arctic Circle and is an important area for the Porcupine Caribou to give birth and raise their young. The U.S. Geologic service estimates that 5.7-16.0 billion barrels of oil are located within the area.

Briefly explain the anthropocentrist and ecocentrist philosophies. What decision would each argue for in this debate? Describe what you feel would be the best argument each side could make. If this was your decision to make alone, what would you do, and why? (5 pts)



Answer :

GinnyAnswer

Final answer:

Anthropocentrism prioritizes human needs, while ecocentrism values ecosystems and interconnectedness. A balanced approach considering both viewpoints is crucial for decision-making.


Explanation:

Anthropocentrism focuses on humans as the central or most important entity, prioritizing human needs and interests over the environment. Those with an anthropocentric philosophy may argue for drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in Alaska to access oil resources for economic benefits.

Ecocentrism considers the environment and ecosystems as central, emphasizing the interconnectedness of all living things. Supporters of ecocentrism would likely advocate against drilling in the Refuge to protect the biodiversity and habitat of species like the Porcupine Caribou.

If faced with the decision alone, a balanced approach considering both anthropocentric and ecocentric viewpoints would be ideal. Evaluating long-term environmental impacts and the rights of indigenous communities would be crucial in making an informed decision.


Learn more about Human-environmental relations here:

https://brainly.com/question/42231327


Other Questions