Analyze the work to find the error.

\begin{tabular}{ll}
& [tex]$11+(3)(9)$[/tex] \\
Step 1: & [tex]$11+(9)(3)$[/tex] \\
Step 2: & [tex]$(11+9)(3)$[/tex] \\
Step 3: & [tex]$20(3)$[/tex] \\
Step 4: & 60
\end{tabular}

A. In Step 1, the commutative property of multiplication was not done correctly.
B. In Step 2, the associative property cannot regroup addition and multiplication.
C. In Step 3, the multiplication must be done first.
D. In Step 4, the product is incorrect.



Answer :

Let's analyze and correct the given sequence of steps in detail:

Given Expression: [tex]\( 11 + (3 \times 9) \)[/tex]

1. Step 1:
- The expression is written as [tex]\( 11 + (9 \times 3) \)[/tex].
- This is correct; we can use the commutative property of multiplication to rewrite [tex]\( 3 \times 9 \)[/tex] as [tex]\( 9 \times 3 \)[/tex] without changing the value.

2. Step 2:
- The next step written is [tex]\( (11 + 9) \times 3 \)[/tex].
- Here is the error: the associative property is incorrectly applied. In proper mathematical operations, parentheses have priority, and multiplication should be performed before addition according to the order of operations (PEMDAS/BODMAS).

3. Correct Approach:
- Let's follow the correct order of operations: Parentheses → Exponents (if any) → Multiplication and Division → Addition and Subtraction.
- First, we perform the multiplication inside the parentheses:
[tex]\[ 3 \times 9 = 27 \][/tex]
- Now we add this result to 11:
[tex]\[ 11 + 27 \][/tex]
- Performing the addition:
[tex]\[ 11 + 27 = 38 \][/tex]

4. Final Step:
- The correct solution after performing the correct order of operations is [tex]\( 38 \)[/tex].

Summary:
- The error in Step 2 was introducing parentheses and regrouping inappropriately, which is not allowed.
- Correct multiplication first gives [tex]\( 3 \times 9 = 27 \)[/tex], then addition [tex]\( 11 + 27 = 38 \)[/tex].

Therefore, the correct result for the given expression [tex]\( 11 + (3 \times 9) \)[/tex] is 38.