Judicial restraint in judicial interpretation encourages judges to limit their power by only striking down laws if clearly unconstitutional, emphasizing respect for precedent and legislative deference.
Judicial restraint is a theory of judicial interpretation that emphasizes judges limiting the exercise of their power, only striking down laws if clearly unconstitutional. This approach contrasts with judicial activism and involves respecting established precedent and deferring to the legislature.
https://brainly.com/question/29545866