Answered

In Wickard v. Filburn, Filburn tried to get the US government to stop limiting the amount of wheat he could grow for his own consumption. Which side promotes religion as a barrier that protects person and property, or does this concept not apply to this case?

A. This concept does not apply to this case.
B. Both sides promote this concept.
C. Wickard promotes this concept.
D. Filburn promotes this concept.



Answer :

GinnyAnswer

Final answer:

In Wickard v. Filburn, the case did not involve promoting religion as a barrier protecting person and property.


Explanation:

Wickard v. Filburn does not promote the concept of religion as a barrier protecting person and property in the case. In this case, the government limited Filburn's wheat production for personal use, which does not involve religious beliefs or practices. The distinction between religious beliefs and practices is crucial in cases related to the protection of religious freedom from government intervention.


Learn more about Religious Freedom and Government Intervention here:

https://brainly.com/question/38413400


Other Questions