Critics of Diderot's argument on the noble savage could dispute its idealization as projecting Western superiority, highlight the mythological aspect of the concept, and criticize its contribution to reinforcing prejudiced dichotomies.
A person who did not subscribe to the ideas of the Enlightenment could criticize Diderot's argument regarding the noble savage by rejecting the idealized image of the noble savage as a projection of Western superiority or by pointing out that such cultural preconceptions were self-serving constructs with no basis in reality.
They might argue that concepts like the noble savage were myths and did not accurately represent indigenous populations, highlighting how these depictions were influenced by European perspectives and did not reflect the true diversity and complexities of indigenous cultures.
Furthermore, critics could contend that the notion of the noble savage perpetuated a dichotomized view of the world, reinforcing prejudiced distinctions between Western Europeans and non-European populations.
https://brainly.com/question/32399976