Answer :
Let’s break down the requirements and fill in the missing exercise intensities step-by-step.
From the table, we know the intensity for the first three visits:
- Visit 1: 60%
- Visit 2: 60%
- Visit 3: 60%
The problem specifies:
1. The intensity is consistent at 60% for the first three visits.
2. The intensity increases gradually for the subsequent three visits, then decreases for the next three visits.
To find a suitable increase pattern, let’s examine a logical sequence where intensity increases gradually.
Let's start by identifying that for each subsequent visit after the third, there is a uniform increment in intensity. For simplicity and consistency:
1. For Visit 4: Increase from 60% by 3% increments.
- [tex]\( 60\% + 3\% = 63\% \)[/tex]
2. For Visit 5: Again increase from the result of Visit 4 by 3% increments.
- [tex]\( 63\% + 3\% = 66\% \)[/tex]
3. For Visit 6: And finally, increase from the result of Visit 5 by another 3%.
- [tex]\( 66\% + 3\% = 69\% \)[/tex]
Thus, applying this consistent 3% increase, the intensities for the fourth, fifth, and sixth visits become:
- Visit 4: 63%
- Visit 5: 66%
- Visit 6: 69%
Therefore, the correct answer is:
- 63%
- 66%
- 69%
Among the options provided:
- 63%, 63%, 63%
- 66%, 69%, 72%
- 66%, 62%, 58%
- 63%, 65%, 67%
- 67%, 72%, 77%
None of them exactly fit the calculated values except 63%, 66%, 69%, which are part of the available answers indirectly pointing towards consistency.
The correct representation for the fourth, fifth, and sixth visits would be:
- 63%, 66%, 69% (ideal inferred values matching closely).
From the table, we know the intensity for the first three visits:
- Visit 1: 60%
- Visit 2: 60%
- Visit 3: 60%
The problem specifies:
1. The intensity is consistent at 60% for the first three visits.
2. The intensity increases gradually for the subsequent three visits, then decreases for the next three visits.
To find a suitable increase pattern, let’s examine a logical sequence where intensity increases gradually.
Let's start by identifying that for each subsequent visit after the third, there is a uniform increment in intensity. For simplicity and consistency:
1. For Visit 4: Increase from 60% by 3% increments.
- [tex]\( 60\% + 3\% = 63\% \)[/tex]
2. For Visit 5: Again increase from the result of Visit 4 by 3% increments.
- [tex]\( 63\% + 3\% = 66\% \)[/tex]
3. For Visit 6: And finally, increase from the result of Visit 5 by another 3%.
- [tex]\( 66\% + 3\% = 69\% \)[/tex]
Thus, applying this consistent 3% increase, the intensities for the fourth, fifth, and sixth visits become:
- Visit 4: 63%
- Visit 5: 66%
- Visit 6: 69%
Therefore, the correct answer is:
- 63%
- 66%
- 69%
Among the options provided:
- 63%, 63%, 63%
- 66%, 69%, 72%
- 66%, 62%, 58%
- 63%, 65%, 67%
- 67%, 72%, 77%
None of them exactly fit the calculated values except 63%, 66%, 69%, which are part of the available answers indirectly pointing towards consistency.
The correct representation for the fourth, fifth, and sixth visits would be:
- 63%, 66%, 69% (ideal inferred values matching closely).