Why have corporations and unions been able to spend unlimited sums of money on campaign advertising since 2010?

A. The FEC wanted to encourage private individuals to spend more hard money on elections.
B. The Supreme Court ruled that campaign spending is a protected form of free speech.
C. The dominant political parties began to rely too much on public campaign funding.
D. The Federal Election Campaign Act loosened restrictions on soft money contributions.



Answer :

Final answer:

The Supreme Court ruling in the Citizens United case allowed corporations and unions to spend unlimited sums on campaign advertising, impacting campaign finance laws, super PACs, and sparking debates on money's role in politics.


Explanation:

The ability of corporations and unions to spend unlimited sums of money on campaign advertising since 2010 can be attributed to the Supreme Court ruling in the Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission case. This decision overturned the soft money ban of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act, granting corporations and unions the right to spend without restrictions, citing free speech rights.

This ruling has significantly influenced campaign finance laws and spending practices, leading to the emergence of super PACs that can raise and spend unlimited funds independently of candidates or parties.

Furthermore, the decision has sparked debates on the role of money in politics, free speech rights, and the influence of corporate interests in elections.


Learn more about Campaign Finance Laws and Supreme Court Rulings here:

https://brainly.com/question/29959721