Final answer:
The answer discusses arguments for and against camera coverage in courtrooms and the potential impacts on the Supreme Court's proceedings and impartiality.
Explanation:
Arguments for allowing cameras in courtrooms:
- Transparency and public trust in the legal system.
- Educational value for the public.
- Enhanced accountability of judges, attorneys, and witnesses.
Arguments against allowing cameras in courtrooms:
- Privacy and security concerns for witnesses and defendants.
- Potential distortion of justice for the sake of media attention.
- Risk of sensationalism and exploitation of sensitive legal proceedings.
Impact of media coverage on the Supreme Court: Television coverage could influence public opinion positively by fostering understanding or negatively by sensationalizing cases. Justices may feel pressure to consider public perception, potentially compromising their impartiality.
Learn more about cameras in courtrooms here:
https://brainly.com/question/37807693
