Which of these arguments is least effective in supporting the dissent of the Supreme Court decision that the students had the right to wear the armbands to school?

A. The school allowed students to wear other controversial symbols.
B. The use of judicial review shows flaws in the majority opinion.
C. Other court cases upheld the rights of schools to limit freedom of expression.
D. The armbands were shown to cause disruption that interfered with learning.

Option D claiming armbands caused disruption is the least effective argument against Supreme Court decision favoring students' right to wear armbands.

Explanation:

The least effective argument in supporting the dissent of the Supreme Court decision in favor of students' right to wear armbands to school is option D, which claimed that the armbands caused disruption interfering with learning. This argument was deemed ineffective because the court found no evidence of actual disruption caused by the armbands and emphasized that the symbolic speech of wearing armbands was protected under the First Amendment.

On the contrary, the Tinker v. Des Moines case of 1969 set a precedent where students' right to symbolic speech through wearing armbands was upheld as protected under the Constitution. The court ruled that such forms of peaceful protest do not justify school officials suppressing students' freedom of speech.

Learn more about Freedom of Speech here:

https://brainly.com/question/51068086