Answer :
The problem requires us to analyze the given table. Here's the step-by-step explanation of the analysis:
1. The table given is:
[tex]\[ \begin{tabular}{rr} 9 & mg \\ 75 & 95 \\ -16 & 98 \\ \hline \end{tabular} \][/tex]
2. From the table, it seems like we have pairs of values under two columns. The specific question that needs to be analyzed or solved is unclear.
3. The first row shows the pair (9, mg). This could be an indicator that `mg` is a variable or a label, and its actual value is determined below.
4. The second and third rows provide pairs (75, 95) and (-16, 98).
5. We need to identify how these pairs relate to each other or determine the value of `mg`. Given the lack of a relationship provided or any specific formula, we need to conclude our analysis based on the pattern or requirements presented.
After reviewing the table and the given information, the result of the analysis is that it is indeterminable or unclear. Therefore, the final conclusion based on my analysis is:
```
None
```
Thus, without additional context or instructions on how to handle the table, the result or the solution to the given question yields no definitive numerical answer.
1. The table given is:
[tex]\[ \begin{tabular}{rr} 9 & mg \\ 75 & 95 \\ -16 & 98 \\ \hline \end{tabular} \][/tex]
2. From the table, it seems like we have pairs of values under two columns. The specific question that needs to be analyzed or solved is unclear.
3. The first row shows the pair (9, mg). This could be an indicator that `mg` is a variable or a label, and its actual value is determined below.
4. The second and third rows provide pairs (75, 95) and (-16, 98).
5. We need to identify how these pairs relate to each other or determine the value of `mg`. Given the lack of a relationship provided or any specific formula, we need to conclude our analysis based on the pattern or requirements presented.
After reviewing the table and the given information, the result of the analysis is that it is indeterminable or unclear. Therefore, the final conclusion based on my analysis is:
```
None
```
Thus, without additional context or instructions on how to handle the table, the result or the solution to the given question yields no definitive numerical answer.