Q1. Read the passage below and answer the questions that follow:

This is what James Mill, the famous economist and political philosopher from Scotland, wrote about the Residents appointed by the company:

"We place a Resident, who really is king of the country, whatever injunctions of noninterference he may act under. As long as the prince acts in perfect subservience, and does what is agreeable to the Residents, that is, to the British Government, things go on quietly; they are managed without the Resident appearing much in the administration of affairs... but when anything of a different nature happens, the moment the prince takes a course which the British Government thinks wrong, then comes clashing and disturbance."

a. Comprehend the term "Residents."
b. Why do you think the Residents were instilled in the court of the Indian rulers?
c. Summarize the views of James Mill with reference to the case study.

Residents were individuals appointed by the British East India Company to oversee Indian rulers and ensure compliance with British interests. They held significant power and were essentially the rulers of the region.

The Residents were instilled in the courts of Indian rulers to maintain British control and influence in the region, ensuring that the rulers acted in accordance with British directives.

James Mill's views portrayed Residents as key figures who were effectively in control, guiding the actions of the Indian princes to align with British interests. When disagreements arose, conflict ensued as the British sought to maintain their authority.

Learn more about British Residents in India here:

https://brainly.com/question/10040954