Direct and circumstantial evidence play roles in proving theft. Direct evidence includes eyewitness testimony and evidence from Joe's home, while circumstantial evidence involves DNA and fingerprint evidence.
Direct evidence directly proves a fact. It can include eyewitness testimony and evidence, such as money, from Joe's home. On the other hand, circumstantial evidence indirectly proves a fact, like DNA evidence and fingerprint evidence.
https://brainly.com/question/32886570