What evidence could the police use to prove that Joe stole the money?

Give at least two examples of potential evidence in your response.

- If the theft occurred in a place monitored by security cameras, footage showing Joe taking the money would be strong evidence against him. This could include video from the scene of the crime or nearby areas that capture his movements before, during, and after the theft.
- Items such as fingerprints on the stolen money or on objects at the crime scene, DNA evidence linking Joe to the theft, or possession of marked bills or other identifiable stolen items found in Joe's possession. This evidence directly connects Joe to the crime scene and the stolen money.

Sample response: During the investigation, the victim's financial records show that on every night money was stolen, Joe was the closer. The money found in his drawer at home is exactly the same amount missing from the restaurant. Police questioned witnesses who saw Joe with the extra cash. This evidence made Joe the most likely suspect.

Which of these types of evidence are included in your response? Check all that apply.

- Financial records of the business
- Information about work schedules
- Evidence, such as money, from Joe's home
- Eyewitness testimony
- Testimony from Joe



Answer :

Final answer:

Direct and circumstantial evidence play roles in proving theft. Direct evidence includes eyewitness testimony and evidence from Joe's home, while circumstantial evidence involves DNA and fingerprint evidence.


Explanation:

Direct evidence directly proves a fact. It can include eyewitness testimony and evidence, such as money, from Joe's home. On the other hand, circumstantial evidence indirectly proves a fact, like DNA evidence and fingerprint evidence.


Learn more about Roles of direct and circumstantial evidence in proving theft here:

https://brainly.com/question/32886570