Let's go through the question and evaluate the given expressions step-by-step.
1. Expression Analysis:
```
B.) V \cdot S \cdot A ÷
```
The provided expression is:
- `V S A ÷`
However, this expression seems incomplete and lacks context. Thus, it cannot be evaluated meaningfully in its current form.
2. Additional Calculation Provided:
```
2 x 1 = 2
```
This is a straightforward multiplication showing that 2 times 1 equals 2.
3. Meaningless Evaluation:
Here we evaluate why certain expressions are considered meaningless:
```
i) L L X - Because L cannot be repeated
```
- Reason: In many numeral systems, letters or symbols have specific rules regarding their repetition. For instance, in Roman numerals, certain letters cannot be repeated consecutively. 'L' represents 50 in Roman numerals, and it cannot be repeated.
```
ii) I L - (No reason provided yet)
```
- Reason: Likely, this expression might not adhere to the standard format or rule within a numeral system or context being used. For example, in Roman numerals, 'I' (1) before 'L' (50) isn't a valid numeral combination.
Summary:
- The expression `V S A ÷` is incomplete and therefore meaningless.
- The multiplication `2 x 1 = 2` is valid and straightforward.
- Certain expressions are meaningless due to rules in numeral systems, such as the non-repetition of 'L' and invalid format combinations like 'I L'.
Conclusion:
The given context suggested:
- The expression `V S A ÷` is meaningless.
- 'LLX' is meaningless because 'L' cannot be repeated.
- 'IL' is meaningless, presumably due to invalid numeral combination rules.
Thus, the correct conclusion for the incomplete or unordered expression and specific constraints on numeral systems leads us to conclude that certain expressions are meaningless in the given context.
