In legal contexts, consensual encounters with law enforcement are defined by the suspect's ability to end the interaction, exemplified by the Florida v. Bostick case and guidelines set in Terry v. Ohio.
Consensual encounters with law enforcement are characterized by the notion that a reasonable person in the suspect's position would feel free to decline officers' requests or end the encounter.
In Florida v. Bostick (1991), the Supreme Court held that if a person feels free to terminate the encounter with police, it can be deemed consensual, even if in a police-citizen interaction.
Similarly, Terry v. Ohio (1968) established guidelines for police stops based on reasonable suspicion, offering insight into lawful encounters between individuals and law enforcement.
https://brainly.com/question/33903563