Scientists often work on projects for a long time and fail to see sources of error in their research. Which process allows an outside expert to look at the scientist's project and point to sources of error?

A. Direct funding
B. Peer review
C. Conclusive research
D. Data collection



Answer :

Final answer:

Peer review is a vital process in science that involves experts reviewing a scientist's work to correct errors and ensure accuracy.


Explanation:

Peer review is the process that allows an outside expert to examine a scientist's project and identify sources of error. It involves other scientists in the same field carefully scrutinizing the project before it is published, helping to improve the research and ensure its accuracy. This method is essential for building a reliable body of research and knowledge in science.


Learn more about Peer Review here:

https://brainly.com/question/28500731