Answered

The Tinker v. Des Moines Supreme Court case concerned two students who wore black armbands to school to protest the Vietnam War. The school district suspended the students, possibly violating their right to free speech. Which best summarizes the dissenting opinion?

A. Because the armbands protested the Vietnam War, the lawsuit was actually a question of Second Amendment rights.
B. The Des Moines Supreme Court had already ruled in favor of the school to suspend the students.
C. It was proven that other students were allowed to wear controversial symbols, so their suspension was unconstitutional.
D. There is precedent for schools limiting the rights of students when they anticipate a disruption.



Answer :

GinnyAnswer

Final answer:

The dissenting opinion in the Tinker v. Des Moines case highlighted the potential for schools to limit student rights in cases of anticipated disruptions.


Explanation:

The dissenting opinion in the Tinker v. Des Moines Supreme Court case suggested that there is a precedent for schools to limit students' rights when anticipating disruptions.

It did not view the case as a Second Amendment rights issue or suggest that the prior ruling favored the school's suspension of the students. It also did not base its dissent on the allowance of other controversial symbols.


Learn more about Tinker v. Des Moines Supreme Court case here:

https://brainly.com/question/29617801


Other Questions