What is being conveyed through the following passage from the essay "Made in Taiwan? How a Frenchman Fooled 18th-Century London" by Benjamin Breen?

"Posterity has treated Psalmanazar as little more than a literary footnote. Throughout the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, authors would retell his story as either a humorous anecdote or a tragic tale, depending on their personal inclinations."

A. The body of the essay.
B. The counterclaims of the text.
C. The claim of the text.
D. The concluding statement.

The passage from Benjamin Breen's essay discusses the varied historical portrayals of Psalmanazar, showcasing how subsequent authors viewed his story with either humor or tragedy.

Explanation:

Analysis of the Passage:

In the passage from Benjamin Breen's essay, the author highlights the historical treatment of Psalmanazar as a literary figure. The text conveys how Psalmanazar was viewed in subsequent centuries, either as a source of humor or as a figure of tragedy, depending on the perspective of the authors retelling his story.

Significance of the Passage:

Legacy Reflections: The passage underscores how history has shaped the perception of individuals like Psalmanazar, with subsequent writers framing his narrative in different lights. Interpretive Lens: It also suggests the evolving nature of storytelling, where the same historical figure can be interpreted diversely over time. Authorial Influence: Breen uses Psalmanazar's case to showcase how an individual's story can reflect broader themes of humor, tragedy, and the malleability of historical narratives.

Learn more about analysis of historical figures and storytelling in literature here:

https://brainly.com/question/38239571