Circular reasoning asserts conclusions without valid support, hasty generalization draws broad conclusions from limited examples, and biased sample uses skewed evidence for conclusions.
Circular reasoning is a fallacy that occurs when the conclusion is repeated or asserted without providing valid reasons to support it. This type of fallacy involves supporting a premise with the same premise, creating the illusion of validity without actual evidence.
In contrast, hasty generalization is a fallacy where a broad conclusion is drawn from insufficient examples. It occurs when a speaker jumps to a generalization without an adequate number of examples to support the claim.
Biased sample is another weak induction fallacy where the evidence used to draw a conclusion is skewed or prejudiced in some way, leading to an unreliable or unfair inference.
https://brainly.com/question/29368484