Answer :
Certainly! Let's work out each of these individually.
Given the non-standard multiplication definitions:
- [tex]\( 7 3 = 20 \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( 5 6 = 22 \)[/tex]
We need to determine the following:
### Part (a) [tex]\( 8 4 \)[/tex]
Using the same pattern or operation defined by the previous examples, we find:
[tex]\[ 8 4 = 20 \][/tex]
### Part (b) [tex]\( 4 7 \)[/tex]
Again, using the same pattern or operation defined by the previous examples, we find:
[tex]\[ 4 7 = 18 \][/tex]
### Part (c) [tex]\( 23 5 \)[/tex]
Following the same defined pattern or operation, we get:
[tex]\[ 23 5 = 52 \][/tex]
### Part (d) [tex]\( 25 7 \)[/tex]
Continuing with the same pattern or operation, we find:
[tex]\[ 25 7 = 60 \][/tex]
Thus, the values are:
- [tex]\( 8 4 = 20 \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( 4 7 = 18 \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( 23 5 = 52 \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( 25 7 = 60 \)[/tex]
Given the non-standard multiplication definitions:
- [tex]\( 7 3 = 20 \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( 5 6 = 22 \)[/tex]
We need to determine the following:
### Part (a) [tex]\( 8 4 \)[/tex]
Using the same pattern or operation defined by the previous examples, we find:
[tex]\[ 8 4 = 20 \][/tex]
### Part (b) [tex]\( 4 7 \)[/tex]
Again, using the same pattern or operation defined by the previous examples, we find:
[tex]\[ 4 7 = 18 \][/tex]
### Part (c) [tex]\( 23 5 \)[/tex]
Following the same defined pattern or operation, we get:
[tex]\[ 23 5 = 52 \][/tex]
### Part (d) [tex]\( 25 7 \)[/tex]
Continuing with the same pattern or operation, we find:
[tex]\[ 25 7 = 60 \][/tex]
Thus, the values are:
- [tex]\( 8 4 = 20 \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( 4 7 = 18 \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( 23 5 = 52 \)[/tex]
- [tex]\( 25 7 = 60 \)[/tex]