James Rachels argues that active euthanasia is preferable due to its ability to reduce patient suffering more effectively.
James Rachels challenges the notion that active euthanasia is morally wrong while passive euthanasia is permissible. He argues that the intent and result in both cases are the same, but active euthanasia can actually reduce patient suffering more effectively. Therefore, Rachels asserts that active euthanasia is preferable as it brings a swift end to suffering.
https://brainly.com/question/40871405