The Biological Design Argument questions if evolution can explain features of living things showing irreducible complexity
The argument that evolution cannot explain some basic features of living things, particularly those displaying irreducible complexity, is often presented by proponents of the Biological Design Argument (BDA). This argument suggests that certain structures or organisms have features that are too complex to have evolved through natural selection alone, leading to the inference of an intelligent designer, such as God, bridging these 'gaps' in evolution.
Examples like the bacterial flagellum and the eye have been historically cited as irreducibly complex structures; however, evolutionary biologists have later provided explanations for them, showing that initially incomprehensible complexity can indeed have evolutionary origins.
While gaps in evolutionary theory persist, the scientific community believes that ongoing research and understanding will continue to provide explanations for these apparent complexities, challenging the premise of Intelligent Design.
https://brainly.com/question/44001589