Answered

### English 11
#### Reading: Tinker v. Des Moines

Reading Guide

Name:
Date:

Write short answers to the following questions:

1. What are two of Justice Fortas's basic reasons for ruling in favor of the students?
2. What are two of Justice Black's basic reasons for disagreeing with the majority opinion?
3. Why do the judges reference other cases in their explanations?
4. Do you think students should have the same rights in school as outside of school? Why or why not?



Answer :

Final answer:

Students should have similar rights in school as outside of school to protect freedom of expression, justices in Tinker v. Des Moines had different views on the case, referencing other cases provides legal context.


Explanation:

Answers:

  1. Justice Fortas ruled in favor of the students because students do not lose their First Amendment rights at school and the school lacked evidence of substantial disruption caused by the armbands.
  2. Justice Black disagreed due to his belief that schools have the right to regulate conduct to prevent disturbances and maintain order, and he argued that the majority's decision could endanger the school's ability to provide a conducive learning environment.

Why Judges Reference Other Cases:

Judges reference other cases to provide legal precedent and context for their decisions, showing how past rulings influence current interpretations of the law.

Students' Rights in School:

Students should have similar rights in school as outside of school to ensure their freedom of expression and speech is protected, fostering a democratic environment where diverse viewpoints can be shared without fear of censorship.


Learn more about Tinker v. Des Moines here:

https://brainly.com/question/34196784