If you were in McKinley's position, what would you have done? Would you have annexed the Philippines? Why or why not?

First, make a list of pro and con arguments about this question. You will use that list to support the decision you would make.

Arguments in Favor of Annexation:

1. The trade with Asia would be easier for the United States.
2. The United States could improve education and the governmental system in the Philippines.
3. The United States would be able to access agricultural products that aren't available in the U.S.

Arguments Against Annexation:

1. It would include pushing American beliefs and methods on non-adoptive populations.
2. This would most likely lead to a war.
3. This would mean a change in American values that had previously favored liberty.



Answer :

Final answer:

McKinley's decision to annex the Philippines was influenced by strategic and economic considerations despite concerns about imposing American values on the Filipino population.


Explanation:

Arguments in Favor of Annexation

  1. The trade with Asia would be easier for the United States.
  2. The United States could improve education and the governmental system.
  3. The United States would be able to access agricultural products that aren't in the U.S.

Arguments Against Annexation

  • It would include pushing American beliefs and methods on non-adoptive populations.
  • This would most likely lead to a war.
  • This would mean a change in American values that had previously favored liberty.

Considering the arguments, McKinley's decision to annex the Philippines was influenced by the strategic value the Philippines offered in terms of military power and commerce. Despite concerns about imposing American ideals on the Filipino population and the potential for conflict, the benefits of securing a gateway to Asian markets and accessing raw materials for American industry played a significant role in the annexation decision.


Learn more about American imperialism here:

https://brainly.com/question/30018629