Julian asked, "How much of what you think about the ethnic majority is what you really feel, and how much is what your culture says you're supposed to feel? I don't mean to be rude, but you seem like such a friendly guy, it's kind of weird to hear you speak so badly about the ethnic majority."

Chandu replied, "Well, I'm smart enough to know that there are good people and bad people in all groups. But our conflict has gone on for hundreds of years. There has been actual armed fighting, massacres, and just everyday oppression. It's hard to look at a member of the ethnic majority and not see him as a representative of his group first and an individual second. There have been many attempts to make peace, but all of them have failed."

Chandu added, "And I should point out that the failure of the peace attempts has never been my people's fault. We're a reasonable group asking for reasonable things. The ethnic majority, though—they're happy to be unreasonable if it's to their advantage."

Chandu's statements indicate that diplomacy has been unsuccessful so far, and multi-track diplomacy might be necessary. Which of the following can result from multi-track diplomacy?

A. International sanctions
B. Reparations
C. Lengthy prison sentences
D. Intervention by state actors



Answer :

Final answer:

Multi-track diplomacy involves different approaches to resolving conflicts beyond governmental levels, including state actor intervention, international sanctions, and peacebuilding.


Explanation:

Multi-track diplomacy involves utilizing various channels and approaches to conflict resolution, going beyond traditional governmental levels. It can result in intervention by state actors, international sanctions, and efforts towards peacebuilding. This approach acknowledges the complexities of conflicts and the need for diverse strategies to achieve sustainable peace.


Learn more about Multi-track Diplomacy here:

https://brainly.com/question/43261694