The original text appears to be nonsensical and doesn't convey a clear mathematical or logical meaning. I will rewrite it to make sense within a plausible mathematical context.

---

Evaluate the following expression:

[tex]\[ \sum_{i=1}^{3} i + \bigwedge_{j=1}^{2} j \][/tex]

(Note: The symbol [tex]\(\bigwedge\)[/tex] could represent a logical AND or another operation, so clarify the context if necessary.)



Answer :

It looks like the question may be written in a non-standard or incorrect mathematical notation. However, I will assume the problem involves solving compound inequalities involving a variable [tex]\(a\)[/tex], as interpreted from the provided solution. Here's a detailed, step-by-step solution following this assumption:

1. Solve the first inequality:

Consider the inequality [tex]\(2a - 3 > 0\)[/tex].

[tex]\[ 2a - 3 > 0 \][/tex]

To solve for [tex]\(a\)[/tex], add 3 to both sides of the inequality:

[tex]\[ 2a > 3 \][/tex]

Next, divide both sides by 2:

[tex]\[ a > \frac{3}{2} \][/tex]

This means that [tex]\(a\)[/tex] must be greater than [tex]\(\frac{3}{2}\)[/tex].

2. Solve the second inequality:

Consider the inequality [tex]\(4a + 9 \leq 25\)[/tex].

[tex]\[ 4a + 9 \leq 25 \][/tex]

To solve for [tex]\(a\)[/tex], subtract 9 from both sides of the inequality:

[tex]\[ 4a \leq 16 \][/tex]

Next, divide both sides by 4:

[tex]\[ a \leq 4 \][/tex]

This means that [tex]\(a\)[/tex] must be less than or equal to 4.

3. Combine the inequalities:

We now have two inequalities: [tex]\(a > \frac{3}{2}\)[/tex] and [tex]\(a \leq 4\)[/tex].

When we combine these inequalities, we get:

[tex]\[ \frac{3}{2} < a \leq 4 \][/tex]

This can be interpreted as [tex]\(a\)[/tex] lying in the interval:

[tex]\[ \left(\frac{3}{2}, 4\right] \][/tex]

In conclusion, the solution to the compound inequalities [tex]\(2a - 3 > 0\)[/tex] and [tex]\(4a + 9 \leq 25\)[/tex] is [tex]\(\left(\frac{3}{2}, 4\right]\)[/tex].