Which of the following hypothetical examples would be eligible for review by the Supreme Court?

A. The state of Arizona recently passed a law authorizing law enforcement officers to conduct searches at their own discretion.
B. The President refuses a request from a group of citizens to declare May 15th as National Disco Day.
C. Residents from the city of Evansville are outraged by the traffic enforcement cameras that were recently placed at the city's busiest intersections.
D. None of the above.



Answer :

Final answer:

The Supreme Court may review cases involving state laws conflicting with federal laws, as exemplified by Arizona v. United States (2012). Understanding the interplay between state and federal laws is crucial in determining Supreme Court jurisdiction.


Explanation:

The hypothetical example eligible for review by the Supreme Court would be The state of Arizona recently passed a law authorizing law enforcement officers to conduct searches at their own discretion. This scenario involves a state law that could potentially conflict with federal law and constitutional principles, making it a suitable case for Supreme Court review.

Another relevant case, Arizona v. United States (2012), highlighted the Supreme Court's role in affirming federal supremacy on immigration and striking down certain provisions of an Arizona state law.

It's important to consider the balance between state and federal laws when determining the Supreme Court's jurisdiction over cases like the ones presented in the question.


Learn more about Supreme Court review of state laws here:

https://brainly.com/question/39506738