The U.S. was justified in implementing foreign policies like the Monroe Doctrine and Roosevelt Corollary to protect its interests but faced criticism for perceived imperialism and exploitation in Latin America.
The U.S. was justified in implementing foreign policies such as the Monroe Doctrine and the Roosevelt Corollary as they aimed to protect U.S. interests and ensure stability in the Western Hemisphere. The Monroe Doctrine guaranteed independence of nations in the region, while the Roosevelt Corollary allowed intervention in cases of financial instability or political turmoil, often to protect U.S. business interests.
However, these policies led to accusations of American imperialism and economic exploitation in Latin America. The U.S. intervention in countries like Nicaragua, Haiti, and Cuba under the guise of the Roosevelt Corollary was seen as self-serving and oppressive by many Latin Americans.
Ultimately, the U.S. foreign policies of the time were a blend of self-interest and an attempt to exert control and influence in the Western Hemisphere, raising debates on the fine line between justified intervention and bullying tactics.
https://brainly.com/question/28288238